top of page

Results of the 2026 User Fee Study

Writer: Al Causey
Al Causey
Jul 27
1 min read

The long awaited user fee study was presented at the last commission meeting, so I’d like to summarize the study in a few short sentences.


First, we have failed to increase user fees to match our upkeep of city streets, sewers, and storm drains—all the city infrastructure is underfunded because of our failure to keep up with inflation and increased costs of hurricane restoration.


Second, an unfair fee distribution was discovered. While single family residences pay a little less than their proportional amount, the condos pay 138% of their share, and commercial properties pay 77% of their share.


The study also recommended a three year phase in to restore the proper proportions and amounts of user fee funding into the city infrastructure funds. At the end of the three years, the funds should be self-sustaining and allowing for proper maintenance.


Until that point, user fees will be unfairly distributed and the infrastructure funds will be underfunded.


Needless to say, now is the time to correct our path using this current user fee study. It is critical our commission vote to adopt the recommended user fees in tomorrow’s commission meeting on 7/28/2026. Otherwise, our critical needs will be underfunded next year, and the study will be wasted.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Pothole Drive Starts Today!

I’ve learned potholes in St. Pete Beach are repaired by a contractor. Perhaps you have wondered why the pothole on your street has not been repaired? Let me share what I’ve learned and propose a solut

 
 
 
Condition of Parks (and Streets)

Our new Community Group for Beautification has begun documenting park conditions via photographs. Parks are maintained by contractors, and it is important for city staff to monitor contractor performa

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page